Trumps Syria Attack ~ Loose Cannon?

"The US has carried out a missile strike against a Syrian air base in response to a suspected chemical weapons attack on a rebel-held town."

Is this more evidence that Trump is an accident waiting to happen?

Here are my thoughts as to why launching an attack without evidence is dangerous.

1. "Response to a suspected chemical weapons attack"  We shouldn't be attacking when there is just a suspicion.
2. It should be on evidence that is beyond all reasonable doubt not just suspected.
3. Jihadis must be rubbing their hands in glee all they have to do is set off chemical attacks and Trump will launch missiles at Assad.
4. It may have been a Assad chemical attack or it may have been a conventional bomb hitting a chemical store on the ground, no hard evidence has been released.
5. We already got into a war in Iraq on false information that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, which was proved to be incorrect.
6. That war created a vacuum and spawned ISIL.
7. Both wars have created refugees that have swamped Europe.
8. Russian is in Syria backing Assad.
9. Russia has a base in Syria, one of 10 outside Russia and it wants to keep it.
10. USA has 38 bases world wide.
11. USA Would like it if Russia didn't have a base in Syria.
12. As always we have to look at why the big players are moving chess pieces.
13. Oil was the main reason for Iraq look at what companies now control Iraq oil fields.

LINKS
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-39523654